I've always been a bit confused by the difference between the pictures of Christ and the standard of dress missionaries of my church are required to observe. Back in the olden days, men of God could be Men of God and go farmhouse to farmhouse wearing their Fu Manchu's and Mutton Chops without people barricading themselves in their homes and calling the local constable (with those wind-up phones, apparently.)
Now-a-days, the likes of Joseph Stalin, the Unabomber, and David Koresh have given the facial facade a bad reputation. It's now commonly linked to the uneducated, the unclean, and the psychotic. Which is why I'm still surprised that contemporary pictures of the Savior still show him with a beard. Even though we subconsciously associate those attibutes to the living humans we encounter on the street, when we view pictures depicting the Savior those associations are not made. Which is why I couldn't help posting this:

Click the image to see the text:
To set the stage, the wife and I got an email about our Stake missionary efforts (a stake is like a diocese for LDS). It was a survey asking us how we could best be assisted in sharing the gospel with our friends. Unfortunately, the good brother who composed the survey didn't catch the typo on the last question. I didn't send this one in, but I had to share!
I'd like to open this up to comments. What would be the best response to the last question? (And don't get serious on me. That's not what this is about! :0)